BasserJim
Relish Boy

Offline
9643 posts
Ahrensville PA
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (SoonerFan) » | 10:18 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
Guilty. You stop shooting when the threat subsides
|
hunt22-250
Member

Offline
5853 posts
CornField NE
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (BasserJim) » | 10:21 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by BasserJim » | | Guilty. You stop shooting when the threat subsides |
He went from defending himself to a crazed killer.
|
ChiefManyRises
Fishin' Fool
Offline
402 posts
Windsor CO
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (SoonerFan) » | 10:23 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
I think he should not have shot the "downed" threat anymore. He was no longer a threat as he was shot in the head and unconscious. He made the decision to reload and then shoot him additional times. Bad decision on his part. It would be hard not to be pissed at these guys that just threatened your life and not go into survival mode but during the time of reloading and still seeing the guy laying there in a pool of blood and not moving is when he should have been calling 911. He could have just reloaded and been ready if need be. I suspect his defense will be he still felt a threat and maybe he was in the heat of the moment. Redneck's Famous Last Words - "Watch This"
|
shawnrd81
Bass thinker

Offline
1633 posts
fort knox ky
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (SoonerFan) » | 10:24 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
He should have stopped after the threat is gone. There was no reason to go chase someone and empty a pistol at him. He put the public in danger. Then he continues to go back inside and get another weapon and shoot the robber five more times in the chest after he shot him in the head was uncalled for. He will have a one way ticket to jail. I know the defense is going to bring up the ages of the robbers but that is not the case at all here. He defended himself at first which was the right thing to do but then he continued to be a vigilante which is wrong and could have injured someone innocent. Then he shot the robber five more times we can not even do that in Iraq or Afghan it is against the Geneva conventions.
|
bigtexnick
Amateur

Offline
329 posts
FW Texas
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (BasserJim) » | 10:24 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by BasserJim » | | Guilty. You stop shooting when the threat subsides |
that's a good way to put it. i agree. --Nick
|
Lassiter
Member

Offline
1161 posts
Guy AR
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (BasserJim) » | 10:24 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
He left himself open to prosecution when he chased the other boy outside firing at him. Where did the other rounds hit?? He endangered innocent bystanders with his reckless actions. When the second suspect ran the threat and the justification for deadly force was over. 94 Bass Cat Eyra Merc. 150 EFI Feel the Rush!
|
buzzking
Lou Holtz THUCKS!!!

Offline
10250 posts
Lexington ky
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (hunt22-250) » | 10:24 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
I'd probably lean towards reckless manslaughter prompted by temporary insanity. The video shows the threat was neutralized. Going for the other gun made this dude a criminal no matter how big of a piece of scum the deceased was.
|
pbmang
LARGE Member
Offline
909 posts
Acworth GA
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (hunt22-250) » | 10:25 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
I say not guilty and here is why. In this particular situation there is no video showing the downed criminal. If I was in the pharmisist place and was just held up a gun point, I would be VERY defensive. If the criminal who he shot was still moving, I would consider him a threat because I don't know if he is also carrying a gun or not. Even if he was dying, I have no way of knowing if he is still going to try and pull the gun and shoot me. So, if the criminal on the ground was still moving, I could see how he would be considered a threat and he was dealt with.Now, if there was no movement at all, that would be a different story. I still don't think 1st Degree Murder is appropriate though.
|
stakultexsun
1987 Procraft with Evinrude XP150
Offline
216 posts
Plano Tx
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (buzzking) » | 10:26 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
If it were my home, I'd done the same thing. But being in the store, or "my store", knowing I was on camera...no. Honestly though, I'm glad the 16 yr old is dead. I wish the 1st shot would have killed him. Don't you agree? Don't you wish the 1st shot would have killed him? The end result would be the same, but the means would be different.
|
NASCAR
Ohio Mudpuddle Mafia

Online
4965 posts
dayton ohio
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (buzzking) » | 10:29 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
If I have to uphoild the law he is guilty because he shot a person who was no longer a threat. If It was my opinion, at least one scumbag is off the street. And I don't care who you are you probably would have done the same thing. dead men tell no tales, but the camera tells all. http://WWW.ACADEMYIMPROVEMENTS.COM
|
Mark from NY
Offline
9493 posts
Canajoharie NY
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (BasserJim) » | 10:30 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by BasserJim » | | Guilty. You stop shooting when the threat subsides |
Agree 
|
Ronk
Ronk

Online
1013 posts
Millbury MA
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (Mark from NY) » | 10:35 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
Good shot #1 , but no reason to unload a gun after that Now it's premeditated murder I would suspect. Bummer for the guy behins the shooting, and stupity of not dumping the survailance tapes. ,
|
CWCW
Member

Offline
1113 posts
Joshua TX
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (Mark from NY) » | 10:36 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
Yep, guilty. Shoot back to defend yourself, but when the person shot becomes no more of a threat, you stay back hold the gun on him and protect yourself until help arrives.
|
Slopfishin
I'm too drunk to taste this chicken

Offline
2029 posts
Hopkinsville Ky
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (SoonerFan) » | 10:37 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
IMO, that kid forfeited his rights when he pulled a gun on the folks in the shop. Good riddence to bad rubish. Granted, I'm letting my emotions guide my decision, but I just can't help it. Sorry.
|
bassketcase05
4 Time MVP!!!

Offline
1313 posts
Ft. Wayne IN
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (CWCW) » | 10:41 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by CWCW » | | Yep, guilty. Shoot back to defend yourself, but when the person shot becomes no more of a threat, you stay back hold the gun on him and protect yourself until help arrives. | Agreed, the pharmacist went too far IMO. Maybe not murder, but manslaughter??? 2006 Pantera Classic / 200 Optimax Colin Maple, Ft. Wayne IN IRONWORKERS LOCAL 147
|
AJH
AJH
Offline
425 posts
Selbyville DE
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (stakultexsun) » | 10:50 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by stakultexsun » | | If it were my home, I'd done the same thing. But being in the store, or "my store", knowing I was on camera...no. Honestly though, I'm glad the 16 yr old is dead. I wish the 1st shot would have killed him. Don't you agree? Don't you wish the 1st shot would have killed him? The end result would be the same, but the means would be different. |
dam, that's harsh, i don't want to see anyone killed, 1976 15ft LOWE JONBOAT 30LB thrust MOTORGUIDE
|
Bronzefly
bona fied tackle junkie

Offline
4388 posts
East TN
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (AJH) » | 11:03 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
It's a terrible situation all the way around. The propreitor definitely went too far and will pay for his mistake. I would hope he gets a lesser included charge - something along the lines of manslaughter would seem fitting considering the circumstaces. A competent attorney would likely use the "heat of the moment" argument. "It is by the goodness of God that in our country we have these three unspeakably precious things: freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and the prudence to practice neither."
Mark Twain
|
BasserJim
Relish Boy

Offline
9643 posts
Ahrensville PA
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (bassketcase05) » | 11:05 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by bassketcase05 » | | Agreed, the pharmacist went too far IMO. Maybe not murder, but manslaughter??? |
He went and reloaded that gun with the intention of shooting that kid dead. That's pre-meditation, and thats first degree murder. On top of that, they should tack on an attempted murder charge for going after the other kid. IMHO. After that first shot was fired, the one kid ran out, and the other went down and was unconscious. There was no longer a threat to his life. He should have stopped, and called 911. Anything beyond that was in cold blood. I am very much a proponent of defending yourself. I do carry a weapon regularly, and will not hesitate to shoot someone I feel is an unavoidable threat to my life. This guy, however, took it way too far 
|
GaryL
Member

Offline
751 posts
Kennebunkport Maine
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (SoonerFan) » | 11:07 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
It is hard to say, IMO. You can not see the downed suspect in the video. I am sure a good defence attorney will use that there is also no audio. He could very easly say the guy was still moving and posing a threat. Does he deserve to go to jail for doing a public service? If he does go to jail it should only be for reckless conduct with a fire arm. For shooting up the hood he is lucky no one else was hurt. I say to bad he didn't get them both. I have no compation for armed robbers or thieves of anykind. No matter their age. I really feel if there were more folks willing to defend themselves as he did crime would really go down. I wish him well in his fight to stay free. 
|
273 DC
Member

Offline
705 posts
Tarheel NC
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (BasserJim) » | 11:13 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by BasserJim » | He went and reloaded that gun with the intention of shooting that kid dead. That's pre-meditation, and thats first degree murder. On top of that, they should tack on an attempted murder charge for going after the other kid. IMHO. After that first shot was fired, the one kid ran out, and the other went down and was unconscious. There was no longer a threat to his life. He should have stopped, and called 911. Anything beyond that was in cold blood. I am very much a proponent of defending yourself. I do carry a weapon regularly, and will not hesitate to shoot someone I feel is an unavoidable threat to my life. This guy, however, took it way too far |
Very well said, JIM, I agree 100% . At first just reading the post I was in the 2nd murder stage for sure. But after watching the video he went back and reloaded the gun, for the second shooting spree, That is pre meditation , 1st deg murder would be the charge he should be charged with. People like this is who gives CCW licenses holders a bad name. 1999 Stratos 273 / Johnson 150hp (Stratos's little HOT ROD!) "FLIPPING KING"
|
Mark from NY
Offline
9493 posts
Canajoharie NY
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (1993stratos274) » | 11:17 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
16 people so far voted not guilty in the poll but do not submit an explanation why they feel that way. Not saying you have to but it does seem strange. 
|
273 DC
Member

Offline
705 posts
Tarheel NC
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (GaryL) » | 11:18 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
| Quote, originally posted by GaryL » | | Does he deserve to go to jail for doing a public service? If he does go to jail it should only be for reckless conduct with a fire arm. For shooting up the hood he is lucky no one else was hurt. I say to bad he didn't get them both. I have no compation for armed robbers or thieves of anykind. No matter their age. I really feel if there were more folks willing to defend themselves as he did crime would really go down. I wish him well in his fight to stay free. | \Your comment is true, no one knows what they would do in that sit. until it happens to them first hand. Maybe he got tunnel vision and his anger got the best of him. I also HATE the scum who do these crimes and yes maybe they deserved this but if this was legal actions, this world would be a Crazy as hell place to live. It is already bad enough, BUT he just went to far on this one. And YES you are right it is a Damn shame he did not get both of them, but once the threat is gone there is no more self defense issues there. Also sounds like he needs to practice with that thing a little. The one that flashes the gun is the #1 threat, But he shot the other one. Both may need it but I think I would consentrate on the one with the gun first. JMO 1999 Stratos 273 / Johnson 150hp (Stratos's little HOT ROD!) "FLIPPING KING"
|
196 Bobby
Livin' the dream

Offline
933 posts
TN
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (1993stratos274) » | 11:24 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
If he tries to rob me, I cut him into pieces with every round I have, then I go after number 2. Do you think rationally when faced with a situation like this. I don't. The threat may have been neutralized, but it's not always so simple to "turn it off" after faced with a potential life or death situation.
|
273 DC
Member

Offline
705 posts
Tarheel NC
|
| Re: You Be The Jury (196 Bobby) » | 11:31 AM 11/19/2009 |
Reply
Edit
|
That is true, know one can really say what they would do for sure. If the subject can prove what he did was called for, then so be it I hope him the best. Me I might have done the same thing in his situtation. There are many factors to take in to fact. I am just going on what I seen and was told on this post. I still feel he lost it, hope everything works out for him.1999 Stratos 273 / Johnson 150hp (Stratos's little HOT ROD!) "FLIPPING KING"
|
| First 1 2 3 4 > Last |